Rileggendo Piero Calamandrei: “interesse pubblico” nel processo amministrativo e non relatività del principio dell’imparzialità del giudice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15168/adp.2025.2.3715Keywords:
Administrative Justice Proceeding, Administrative Judge, Impartiality of the Judge, Constitutional Principles on Judicial Protection, Due ProcessAbstract
The paper starts from some initial ideas offered by Piero Calamandrei’s essay “La relatività del concetto di azione” of 1939. It analyses some current profiles of the administrative judicial proceeding, focusing in particular on one of the possible problematic issues, the impartiality of the judge as a fundamental component of due process (art. 111 of the Constitution). Among the various stimuli arising from recent trends in jurisprudence, following the issuance of the 2010 Code, two seem very significant regarding the “role” of the administrative judge in the process; they are situated at different levels: the judge’s decision-making power and the procedural investigation. The author’s opinion is that the impartiality of the judge identifies a principle co-essential to the exercise of the judicial function, which also involves the overcoming of any conception that attributes “special” protection to the public interest within the administrative judicial proceeding.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Giovanni D’Angelo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.