Rereading Giannini on the Role of «Judicial Practice» in Developing Criteria for the Interpretation of Administrative Acts
Critical Notes on the Fossilisation of Case Law in Borrowing the Articles 1362-1371 of the Italian Civil Code
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15168/adp.2026.1S.4069Keywords:
interpretation, administrative act, administrative measure, borrowing, autonomyAbstract
This paper re-examines Giannini’s fundamental contribution to studies on the interpretation of administrative acts and criticises the paradigm of borrowing the criteria referred to in Articles 1362-1371 of the Italian Civil Code, on which case law has been fossilised for over a century, highlighting how it lacks a solid foundation and is a source of contradictions and uncertainties.
Downloads
Published
2026-05-05
How to Cite
Monteduro, M. (2026). Rereading Giannini on the Role of «Judicial Practice» in Developing Criteria for the Interpretation of Administrative Acts: Critical Notes on the Fossilisation of Case Law in Borrowing the Articles 1362-1371 of the Italian Civil Code. Antologia Di Diritto Pubblico, (1S), 156–220. https://doi.org/10.15168/adp.2026.1S.4069
Issue
Section
Part II - Readings and Interpretations
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Massimo Monteduro

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.