Christologie als Differenz-Denken
Die anthropologische Relevanz der philosophischen Christologie Rosminis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15168/rs.v0i2.63Keywords:
philosophical Christology, Antonio Rosmini, Xavier Tilliette, Karl Rahner, Friedrich Schleiermacher, Friedrich Schelling, person, conscience, transcendence, history, freedomAbstract
Christology as Thinking in the Difference: The Anthropological Relevance of Rosmini’s Philosophical Christology
Rosmini’s philosophical Christology is here analyzed through the method of Theosophy: an authentically philosophical thought, that accepts data from the Revelation as starting point of a different ontological or, in this case, anthropological vision. This method is very different from the approach Tilliette adopted for the discipline, and enters into a fruitful dialogue with Rahner, Schleiermacher and Schelling. Its peculiarity, however, is to derive from the Chalcedon dogma, formulated in an exclusively negative way, the opportunity to think anthropologically in the difference: concretely, in the difference between consciousness and person. This difference offers the opportunity to conceive in a new way the relationship of the person to transcendence and history.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Markus Krienke

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
