Images in World 2.0 - Instructions for use

Authors

  • Rossella Salerno Politecnico di Milano

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15168/xy.v1i1.17

Abstract

In the essays’ collection The Uses of Images. Studies in the Social Function of Art and Visual Communication (1999), Ernst Gombrich states that images demand in Western society is so significant that it is possible to consider a family without a television, like lacking something. Addressing his thoughts to fundamental requirements on the basis of visual media  – first of all, clarity and communication –  the art historian reminds us the educational role carried out by images in Western culture till latest past, for example in the case of handbooks or encyclopedias. Meantime Gombrich points out how “visual aids” provide a kind of “pictorial instructions”, emphasizing how only few people think that understanding images, both the drawn ones and the in motions ones, is easier when we add verbal descriptions. In light of such considerations, it could be useful to analyze what occurs in web communication, made up with the mutual relationship of images and short texts. The question arising from this paper aims in fact be: what and how does the role of images change in the internet age? Together with the purposes of knowledge and communication, it powerfully opens a new dimension made of images to share: digitization in communication provides new collective knowledge and experience. Furthermore, as some communication’s sociologists affirm, if change in the media seems to drive our society toward a growing confusion between real and unconscious, generating actual showcases to amplify social life (Codeluppi 2012), nowadays is rather in Internet that such process seems to be effective. In virtual places some interpersonal relationships arise and become durable, meantime debates occur to lead ideas and enrich knowledge just possessed by society groups: digital technology, supported by “visual aids”, so allows a new social perception and a growing visibility in the new world 2.0.

References

ASCHER, F., 1997. Métapolis ou l’avenir des villes. Parigi: Odile Jacob, pp. 346.

Aut Aut. 347 Web 2.0. Un nuovo racconto e i suoi dispositivi, 2010, pp. 208.

BELTING, H., 2013. Antropologia delle immagini. Roma: Carocci, pp. 340.

CODELUPPI, V., 2012. Ipermondo. Dieci chiavi per capire il presente. Roma‒Bari: Laterza, pp. 158.

DE WAAL, M., 2014. The City as Interface. How the new Media are changing the City. Rotterdam: NAI010 Publishers, pp. 208.

ECO, U., AUGÈ, M., HUBERMANN, D., 2015. La forza delle immagini. Milano: Franco Angeli, pp. 89.

FOCILLON, H., 2002 (1934). Vita delle forme. Elogio della mano. Torino: Einaudi, pp. 134.

GOMBRICH, E., 1999. L’uso delle immagini. Studi sulla funzione sociale dell’arte e sulla comunicazione visiva. Milano: Leonardo Arte, pp. 290.

GRIES, L. E., 2013. Iconographic Tracking: A Digital Research Method for Visual Rhetoric and Circulation Studies. Computers and Composition. 30, 2013, pp. 332‒348.

HALL, E., 1959. The Silent Language. Garden City: Anchor/Doubleday, pp. 240.

HALLIDAY, M., 1978. Language as Social Semiotic. London: Arnold, pp. 256.

HAWK, B., 2011. Curating Ecologies, circulating musics: From the public sphere to sphere publics. In DOBRIN, S. (Ed.). Ecology, writing theory, and new media. London: Routledge, pp.67‒91.

KENNEDY, J., 1982. Metaphor in Pictures. Perception. 11, 1989, pp. 589–605.

MAPELLI, M. M., 2010. Per una genealogia del virtuale. Dallo specchio a Facebook. Milano: Mimesis, pp. 220.

MCLUHAN, M., 1962. The Gutenberg Galaxy. The Making of Typographic Man. Toronto: Routledge and Kegan, pp. 293.

ONG, W., 2002. Orality and Literacy. The technologizing of the word. New York: Routledge, pp. 216.

ROMANATO, M., 2015. Comunità di immagini urbane. Tesi di Dottorato, Politecnico di Milano, vol. I Testo, pp. 320, vol. II Immagini, pp. 212.

Published

2019-09-05

How to Cite

Salerno, R. (2019). Images in World 2.0 - Instructions for use. XY. Studies on the Representation of Architecture and the Use of the Image in Science and Art, 1(1), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.15168/xy.v1i1.17