Tecniche “nuove”, obblighi “nuovi”? La CGUE in «riscrittura giudiziaria» della direttiva n. 18/2001 CE Nota a Confédération paysanne v. Ministre de l’Agriculture (C-528/16)

Autori

  • Elisa Spiller

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15168/2284-4503-376

Parole chiave:

directive CE/2001/18, precautionary principle, mutagenesis, conflict between national law and EU law, discretional powers of the national legislator transposing EU law

Abstract

This note aims to offer an insightful reading about the decision of the european court of justice in case confédération paysanne v. Ministre de l’agriculture (c-528/16). It focuses on the reasons why the court extended the security measures provided by dir. Ce 2001/18 even to some new methods of mutagenesis; techniques used to make certain rape varieties herbicide-tolerant. In particular, this writing would highlight how the court used the precautionary principle to offer some a new guidance for the interpretation of this directive, such as for the other regulations related to the gmo discipline.

##submission.downloads##

Pubblicato

2019-02-28

Come citare

1.
Spiller E. Tecniche “nuove”, obblighi “nuovi”? La CGUE in «riscrittura giudiziaria» della direttiva n. 18/2001 CE Nota a Confédération paysanne v. Ministre de l’Agriculture (C-528/16). BioLaw [Internet]. 28 febbraio 2019 [citato 21 novembre 2024];(1):513-2. Available at: https://teseo.unitn.it/biolaw/article/view/1329

Fascicolo

Sezione

Note a sentenza