Autonomia e responsabilità medica: la scelta deontologicamente (dis)orientata

Autori

  • Elisabetta Pulice

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15168/2284-4503-362

Parole chiave:

Code of medical ethics, medical autonomy, medical responsibility, biolaw, scientific evidence

Abstract

Starting from the difficulties in balancing the need for certainty with flexibility in the regulation of medical practice, the paper analyses the role of medical ethics in defining, safeguarding and governing medical autonomy and responsibility. Convergences, divergences and mutual relationships between professional ethics and law are discussed, with consideration and evaluation of the challenges the role of this source of (soft)law is facing. Reflecting upon a more broader context of medical responsibility, which does not simply correspond to legal liability, the aim of this paper is, on the one hand, to clarify the framework for the potential but controversial role of the code of medical ethics, and on the other hand, to highlight specific elements and devices that should be taken into consideration in shaping a more coherent model of relationships between law, scientific evidence and medical ethics.

##submission.downloads##

Pubblicato

2019-02-28

Come citare

1.
Pulice E. Autonomia e responsabilità medica: la scelta deontologicamente (dis)orientata. BioLaw [Internet]. 28 febbraio 2019 [citato 22 dicembre 2024];(1):237-59. Available at: https://teseo.unitn.it/biolaw/article/view/1343

Fascicolo

Sezione

Focus on