(Neuro)scienze e processo penale. Tra epistemologia scientifica ed epistemologia giudiziaria

Authors

  • Luciano Calò

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15168/2284-4503-272

Keywords:

Scientific epistemology, judicial epistemology, scientific evidence, adversarial system, rights of parties

Abstract

The relationship between (neuro)sciences and criminal trial is very articulated. (Neuro)Science, in fact, discuss around imputability, ability to rationally participate in a court process, and even free will. The use of scientific knowledge in the court requires careful study of the criminal justice system and particularly of the judicial epistemology and of the rights of the parties. It must be based on a proper analysis of the way we think about science too, because the way of looking at the science has implication on legal instruments and on their use.

Published

2017-11-01

How to Cite

1.
Calò L. (Neuro)scienze e processo penale. Tra epistemologia scientifica ed epistemologia giudiziaria. BioLaw [Internet]. 2017 Nov. 1 [cited 2024 Nov. 24];(3):287-302. Available from: https://teseo.unitn.it/biolaw/article/view/1262

Issue

Section

Essays