La nozione di accanimento terapeutico alla luce del “caso Marasco” e i problemi ancora aperti

Authors

  • Lavinia Del Corona

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15168/2284-4503-745

Keywords:

Overtreatment, self-determination in therapeutic setting, end of life choices, medical liability, parental responsibility, biological damage

Abstract

The paper analyses a case of overtreatment practiced by certain physicians on a child few months old suffering from a very serious syndrome that left no life expectancy, against the will of his parents. The case went before the Court of Bari that has recently ruled in favour of the child’s parents and recognized their right, iure proprio and iure hereditatis, to compensation for the biological damages suffered. The author discusses the peculiarities of the doctor-patient relationship when the patient is a neonate and why in these cases the concept of overtreatment is especially important for the protection of the patient’s rights. The author then moves from the specific case to analyse in broader terms the difficulties still existing in defining what objectively is “overtreatment”.

Published

2021-03-03

How to Cite

1.
Del Corona L. La nozione di accanimento terapeutico alla luce del “caso Marasco” e i problemi ancora aperti. BioLaw [Internet]. 2021 Mar. 3 [cited 2024 Jul. 22];(1):267-83. Available from: https://teseo.unitn.it/biolaw/article/view/1621

Issue

Section

Commentaries