Parenting. Between legislative limits and the (fundamental) interests of the child

Authors

  • Antonio D'Aloia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15168/2284-4503-1780

Keywords:

Parenting, assisted reproduction, surrogacy, best interest of the child, same-sex parenthood

Abstract

Judgments no. 32 and 33 of 2021 represent the last stage of a long process of judicial review of Law no. 40/2004. Compared to the past, in the most recent cases, the Italian Constitutional Court used a different decision-making model, declaring the issues of constitutionality to be inadmissible because of the plurality of possible regulatory solutions and the ethical and social complexity of the topics involved. At the same time, however, the Court called for an urgent and undeferrable intervention by the Parliament. This paper will analyse, on the one hand, the substantive aspects of the two decisions and, on the other hand, the formal aspects linked to the decision-making technique adopted by the Constitutional Court, as well as the possible follow-up of judgement no. 33/2021.

Published

2021-09-29

How to Cite

1.
D’Aloia A. Parenting. Between legislative limits and the (fundamental) interests of the child. BioLaw [Internet]. 2021 Sep. 29 [cited 2024 May 16];(3):73-91. Available from: https://teseo.unitn.it/biolaw/article/view/1780

Issue

Section

Focus on