The best interests of the child between protocol 16 and legislative discretion (passing through the registrar). Notes on judgement no. 33/2021 of the italian constitutional court

Authors

  • Fabio Ferrari

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15168/2284-4503-1800

Keywords:

Medically Assisted Reproduction, international public order, procreative tourism, separation of powers, adoption law

Abstract

The essay analyzes the recent decision n. 33 of 2021 of the Constitutional Court in the field of surrogate motherhood and best interests of the child, having particular regard to the different role played by the merit Courts (which remains subject to the law in adjudicating concrete cases) and Parliament (which has the constitutional power – and the duty as well – to regulate those very delicate issues from a more general perspective).

Published

2021-09-29

How to Cite

1.
Ferrari F. The best interests of the child between protocol 16 and legislative discretion (passing through the registrar). Notes on judgement no. 33/2021 of the italian constitutional court. BioLaw [Internet]. 2021 Sep. 29 [cited 2024 Jul. 3];(3):127-43. Available from: https://teseo.unitn.it/biolaw/article/view/1800

Issue

Section

Focus on