The best interests of the child between protocol 16 and legislative discretion (passing through the registrar). Notes on judgement no. 33/2021 of the italian constitutional court
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15168/2284-4503-1800Keywords:
Medically Assisted Reproduction, international public order, procreative tourism, separation of powers, adoption lawAbstract
The essay analyzes the recent decision n. 33 of 2021 of the Constitutional Court in the field of surrogate motherhood and best interests of the child, having particular regard to the different role played by the merit Courts (which remains subject to the law in adjudicating concrete cases) and Parliament (which has the constitutional power – and the duty as well – to regulate those very delicate issues from a more general perspective).
Downloads
Published
2021-09-29
How to Cite
1.
Ferrari F. The best interests of the child between protocol 16 and legislative discretion (passing through the registrar). Notes on judgement no. 33/2021 of the italian constitutional court. BioLaw [Internet]. 2021 Sep. 29 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];(3):127-43. Available from: https://teseo.unitn.it/biolaw/article/view/1800
Issue
Section
Focus on