The judge at the crossroads between the techno-scientific element and the axiological complexity of reality. Reflections from the Italian case law

Authors

  • Simone Penasa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15168/2284-4503-1803

Keywords:

Science, jurisdiction, techno-scientific issues, science autonomy, beginning and end-of-life issues

Abstract

Moving from the recognition of a mutually influential relationship between the evolution of bio-law and the role of the judge in contemporary societies, the article aims to offer a systematisation of the main approaches that courts tend to adopt when faced with scientifically characterised cases. The proposed classification is based on the function that scientific data can play within the judicial reasoning, as an instrument of recognition and exercise (at least potential) of fundamental rights of the person, as it happens in the context of the beginning of life; or, alternatively, as a context of manifestation of these rights, and of the more general ethical, scientific, and social pluralism that characterizes the issues of bio-law (end of life).

Published

2021-09-29

How to Cite

1.
Penasa S. The judge at the crossroads between the techno-scientific element and the axiological complexity of reality. Reflections from the Italian case law. BioLaw [Internet]. 2021 Sep. 29 [cited 2024 Nov. 24];(3):177-99. Available from: https://teseo.unitn.it/biolaw/article/view/1803

Issue

Section

Focus on

Most read articles by the same author(s)