YOU NEVER GET A SECOND CHANCE TO MAKE A FIRST IMPRESSION. THE ADVISORY JURISDICTION OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE FIRST-EVER (PERHAPS THE LAST?) ADVISORY OPINION REQUEST ON THE OVIEDO CONVENTION

Authors

  • Benedetta Vimercati

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15168/2284-4503-2236

Keywords:

Oviedo Convention, European Court of Human Rights, advisory opinion mechanisms, advisory and contentious jurisdiction, the constitutionalisation of the ECtHR

Abstract

On September 2021, the ECtHR has delivered its first-ever decision on a request for an advisory opinion under art. 29 of the Oviedo Convention. The ECtHR has established – giving a strict interpretation of the limits of its advisory jurisdiction – that the request is not within its competence ratione materiae. The present paper aims at analyzing the decision deepening the theoretical framework the Court offered about its advisory jurisdiction, focusing on the similarities and differences among the ECHR’s advisory opinion mechanisms, and providing food for thought about the contextualization of this decision within the ECtHR’s constitutionalisation process.

Published

2022-04-12

How to Cite

1.
Vimercati B. YOU NEVER GET A SECOND CHANCE TO MAKE A FIRST IMPRESSION. THE ADVISORY JURISDICTION OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE FIRST-EVER (PERHAPS THE LAST?) ADVISORY OPINION REQUEST ON THE OVIEDO CONVENTION. BioLaw [Internet]. 2022 Apr. 12 [cited 2024 Nov. 23];(1):9-48. Available from: https://teseo.unitn.it/biolaw/article/view/2236

Issue

Section

Essays