Dobbs’s Challenge to mainstream constitutionalism and the role in the member states: resilience attempts of a polyarchy

Authors

  • Roberto Toniatti

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15168/2284-4503-2556

Keywords:

Polyarchy, Reproductive rights, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, Abortion, Federalism

Abstract

Polyarchy, as a distinct category in the theory of forms of government, is inclusive of the role plaid by acts, facts and actors other the ones considered in established categories of forms of government. The hypothesis appears to be confirmed and verified through an analysis of some factors of resilience to the case law in Dobbs. Such factors are referenda that have been voted in some states (California, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Vermont and, indirectly, Montana) and have achieved giving constitutional status to reproductive rights; as well as some post Dobbs case law by some state Supreme Courts (Indiana and South Carolina, not in Idaho).

Published

2023-03-18

How to Cite

1.
Toniatti R. Dobbs’s Challenge to mainstream constitutionalism and the role in the member states: resilience attempts of a polyarchy. BioLaw [Internet]. 2023 Mar. 18 [cited 2024 Dec. 11];(1S):39-51. Available from: https://teseo.unitn.it/biolaw/article/view/2556

Issue

Section

The Dobbs decision and US constitutionalism