Ex malo, bonum? Dilemmas (and Opportunities) as a result of Dobbs

Authors

  • Francesco Clementi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15168/2284-4503-2557

Keywords:

Abortion, United States Supreme Court, Jurisprudence, Women’s Rights, Reproduction

Abstract

This contribution aims to retrace the fundamental stages of the complex and critical jurisprudential affirmation of the right to voluntary termination of pregnancy in the US experience, trying to synthetically highlight at least three elements: (a) the political-social difficulty that there is today in the search for a new political-juridical balance to be established at the federal level; (b) the path of the ‘defederalization’ of rights as an always helpful tool for posing crucial questions to the people in a federal state; finally (c) highlight the potential opportunities offered by the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization of 2022 ruling to reduce social-political polarization and confrontation.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-18

How to Cite

1.
Clementi F. Ex malo, bonum? Dilemmas (and Opportunities) as a result of Dobbs. BioLaw [Internet]. 2023 Mar. 18 [cited 2024 Jul. 22];(1S):53-62. Available from: https://teseo.unitn.it/biolaw/article/view/2557

Issue

Section

The Dobbs decision and US constitutionalism