Quello che la legge non dice. L’interruzione delle terapie di sostegno vitale in assenza di una volontà espressa dall’infermo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15168/2284-4503-520Parole chiave:
Human dignity, vegetative state, substituted judgement, best interestAbstract
The essay deals with the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment from an adult in permanent vegetative state or in a minimally conscious state, in the absence of a will expressed by the patient. The Italian l. n. 219/2017 has not changed matters, because it does not explain how, in this case, autonomy and human dignity can be properly safeguarded. Under a comparative point of view, the essay deals with the French and the English statutory framework governing the scrutiny of any decision to withdraw clinically assisted nutrition and hydration.
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
2020-03-10
Come citare
1.
Giaimo G. Quello che la legge non dice. L’interruzione delle terapie di sostegno vitale in assenza di una volontà espressa dall’infermo. BioLaw [Internet]. 10 marzo 2020 [citato 21 novembre 2024];(1):123-39. Available at: https://teseo.unitn.it/biolaw/article/view/1462
Fascicolo
Sezione
Focus on