Quando si dice non più. Ragionando sugli artt. 5, comma, 1 e 6, commi 1 e 3 della Legge n. 40/2004

Autori

  • Franca Meola

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15168/2284-4503-736

Parole chiave:

Informed consent, withdrawal of consent, freedom not to procreate, principle of self-determination, paternity

Abstract

Reasoning on articles 5, paragraph 1, and 6, paragraphs 1 and 3, of law no. 40 of 2004, the essay wonders what is the most "fair" definition of judgments against the male partner of a couple who, after having given their consent to the use of MAP techniques, before such treatment is completed by means of the implantation in utero of the embryos formed, manifest the firm will not to continue in the couple's bond, dissolving it, and the equally strenuous choice to interrupt the search for the child, revoking the consent originally expressed for the use of new procreative methods.

##submission.downloads##

Pubblicato

2021-03-03

Come citare

1.
Meola F. Quando si dice non più. Ragionando sugli artt. 5, comma, 1 e 6, commi 1 e 3 della Legge n. 40/2004. BioLaw [Internet]. 3 marzo 2021 [citato 28 febbraio 2024];(1):75-104. Available at: https://teseo.unitn.it/biolaw/article/view/1630

Fascicolo

Sezione

Saggi