Obiezione di coscienza nell’interruzione di gravidanza ancora a giudizio? Punti fermi e prospettive future

Authors

  • Benedetta Liberali

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15168/2284-4503-712

Keywords:

Health, conscientious objection, voluntary termination of pregnancy, European Court of Human Rights, self-determination

Abstract

The essay examines the problems connected to the exercise of the right of conscientious objection in the matter of voluntary termination of pregnancy, starting with the two recent decisions of the European Court of Human Rights against Sweden. Taking into account these two decisions and those of the European Committee of Social Rights against Italy, as well as the Italian constitutional principles, the essay focuses on the position of doctors and health professionals who decide to refuse services strictly connected to a freely chosen profession.

Published

2020-11-02

How to Cite

1.
Liberali B. Obiezione di coscienza nell’interruzione di gravidanza ancora a giudizio? Punti fermi e prospettive future. BioLaw [Internet]. 2020 Nov. 2 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];(3):347-5. Available from: https://teseo.unitn.it/biolaw/article/view/1588

Issue

Section

Commentaries

Most read articles by the same author(s)