Conflicts and shared decision-making in advance care planning

Authors

  • Paolo Malacarne
  • Gaia Marsico
  • Silvia Zullo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15168/2284-4503-3402

Keywords:

Advance care planning, shared care planning, relational autonomy, ethics of care, conflicts, shared decision-making

Abstract

Advance care planning is a widely underutilized practice in clinical settings. This gap in practice highlights the need to explore further how patients, families, and the healthcare team engage in shared decision-making as a process aimed at promoting patient autonomy within a relational dynamic experienced in the therapeutic context. From this perspective, the focus of this analysis concerns disagreement and potential conflict within care relationships, which are strongly marked by the gap between hypothetical scenarios and actual decision-making processes in clinical practice. Starting from the description of a clinical case, this analysis aims to promote strategies to make advance care planning a valuable and effective tool in clinical practice to prevent conflicts, which encourages patients to discuss their desires, preferences, and choices to facilitate patient engagement and to simplify and support the medical decision-making process.

Published

2025-03-20

How to Cite

1.
Malacarne P, Marsico G, Zullo S. Conflicts and shared decision-making in advance care planning. BioLaw [Internet]. 2025 Mar. 20 [cited 2025 Apr. 4];(1S):71-82. Available from: https://teseo.unitn.it/biolaw/article/view/3402

Issue

Section

PARTE I) LA PIANIFICAZIONE CONDIVISA DELLE CURE TRA NORME E “BUONE” PRATICHE