The Controversial Relationship Between Scientific Expertise and Political Discretion in Times of Climate Crisis: Who Decides on Global Warming Policies?

Authors

  • Antonietta Lupo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15168/2284-4503-4132

Keywords:

climate change, science, political discretion, climate justice, public decision-making processes

Abstract

This paper analyzes the relationship between political assessments by authorities responsible for climate governance and the constraints arising from scientific expertise and technical data available to public decision-makers, also in light of the way this relationship is addressed in case law. Taking as its starting point the freedom of political authorities to interpret and implement climate stabilization commitments stemming from climate change law, the stated intent here is to outline some lines of reflection on the limits of admissibility of scientific debate in public decision-making processes on climate change.

Published

2026-05-29

How to Cite

1.
Lupo A. The Controversial Relationship Between Scientific Expertise and Political Discretion in Times of Climate Crisis: Who Decides on Global Warming Policies?. BioLaw [Internet]. 2026 May 29 [cited 2026 Jun. 13];(3S):181-94. Available from: https://teseo.unitn.it/biolaw/article/view/4132